October
29-Nov 3, 2004 issueNew Troubles

what the
future holds: Awaiting final word on whether he can remain
in the U.S., Malachy McAllister also mourns his wife.
Photo
By: Mike Mergen
 |
 |
A Philadelphia-based appeals
court will define what "engaged in terrorist activities" means.
by Mike Newall
On a cold Saturday afternoon in October, Malachy
McAllister stands outside the James A. Byrne U.S. Courthouse at
Sixth and Market streets.
It is the first time the 47-year-old Wallington,
N.J., resident is laying eyes on the building where his family's
future will soon be decided by the Third Circuit Superior Court of
Appeals.
"This is where it will end," he says, appraising
the plain, brick facade.
For nearly nine years, McAllister, a
thick-shouldered man, with salt-and-pepper stubble and piercing blue
eyes, has been fighting to secure a life in America for he and his
family. More than two decades ago, McAllister took action against a
British government he deemed "oppressors." For that, the United
States Justice Department wants to deport the McAllisters back to
Northern Ireland, a homeland they fled 16 years ago, fearing for
their lives.
In the eyes of the United States government,
McAllister, a mason and father of four, is a terrorist, a "threat to
the security" of the country.
Last month, the Third Circuit Court began
reviewing the case of McAllister v. Ashcroft. A decision will be
handed down sometime early next year. It will be a final
determination of the McAllisters' fate. The decision will also offer
legal precedent into what exactly it means to be a "terrorist."
"Whose purpose does it serve to see my family torn
apart?" he asks, buttoning up his suit jacket as the wind picks up.
"What threat do I pose to anyone?"
McAllister was raised Catholic in the Lower Ormeau
Road section of Belfast in the strife-torn Northern Ireland of the
1970s. He came of age at the height of "the troubles"—the sectarian
violence between the Catholic minority opposed to British rule and
the Protestant majority loyal to the crown.
As Catholics, the McAllisters were second-class
citizens. They had few civil rights and endured daily humiliations
at the hands of the British occupationary forces.
As a child, Malachy witnessed his father being
beaten at a civil rights protest. Other times, he watched as family
members and neighbors were hauled off to government prison
camps—often without reason.
McAllister's neighborhood was known as the "Murder
Mile" because of how frequently the loyalist paramilitary squads
visited.
He was 16 the first time he watched a friend die
in the street. It was Jim Templeton, his best friend, shot dead in a
loyalist drive-by outside The Rose and Crown, Ormeau Road's local
Catholic pub. McAllister was standing just a few feet away.
"Catholics were being murdered left, right and
center,'" he says. "We were in a full-scale civil war."
On one occasion, a gun was put to McAllister's
head as he was ordered off a work site in a Protestant neighborhood.
McAllister was 22 when he cast his lot with the
Irish National Liberation Army and helped plot two strikes against
the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC), Belfast's predominantly
Protestant police force, which often aided the loyalist
paramilitaries in their attacks against Catholic civilians. On a hot
summer day in 1981, McAllister took part in an ambush on a RUC
convoy traveling down Ormeau Road. He served as a lookout for a
shooter. One RUC officer was wounded with a gunshot to the leg.
"I regret what I did," says McAllister. "But it
was a time when you were called upon to stand up and fight back."
A paid informant soon betrayed McAllister. Under
interrogation, British authorities told McAllister that his wife,
Bernadette—a strong-willed, blonde beauty he met along Ormeau
Road—and their growing family would be in danger if he didn't sign a
confession. Malachy spent nearly four years in the H-Blocks, the
political wing of Northern Ireland's notorious Long Kesh prison.
After his 1985 release, Malachy tried to put the
resistance behind him and took construction work to support his
family. But the RUC was not willing to forgive McAllister's past. In
one particularly brutal incident, members of the RUC forced
Bernadette to watch as they savagely beat her husband with the butts
of their rifles.
On the night of Oct. 2, 1988, two loyalist gunmen
disguised in Halloween masks showed up at the McAllisters' home. An
RUC contact had provided them with the address. Malachy and
Bernadette weren't home that night, but three of their four children
were inside with their grandmother. The gunmen calmly pointed their
AK-47s at the front room and fired off 26 rounds. One of the gunmen
spotted the children through a bedroom window and turned his weapon
on them. Amazingly, the McAllister family escaped unhurt.
Three months later, the McAllisters fled
Belfast—moving first to Toronto, and then, in 1996, to New Jersey.
The family entered the country legally,
immediately applied for political asylum and went about creating a
life in America. Malachy began a masonry business, enrolled the kids
in school and joined the local parish. Gary and Jaime, the two
oldest McAllister children, married Jersey girls. Nicola, the third
oldest, is now applying to colleges. Sean, the youngest, is a
standout receiver on the high school football team.
In October 2000, after a lengthy trial, a federal
immigration judge ordered Malachy deported due to his past
conviction in Belfast but granted asylum to Bernadette and the
children. The judge ruled that the McAllister family had suffered
"extreme persecution" and endured a "constant campaign of
harassment."
McAllister filed an appeal against his
deportation, and the government appealed the asylum granted to his
family.
A bad omen came in July 2003, when John McNicholl,
another former member of the Irish National Liberation Army who had
lived peacefully with his family in Upper Darby for almost 20 years,
was seized and deported. At 5:30 a.m. July 17, McNicholl stepped out
his front door to head off to work when federal immigration agents
swarmed. He was put in handcuffs and thrown into the back of a van.
His son cried out in protest, but nothing could be done. Within
hours, McNicholl was hustled aboard a plane back to Ireland, in all
likelihood never to see Upper Darby again.
Last November, amongst friends and family, Malachy
and Bernadette celebrated their 25th wedding anniversary at a local
pub in Wallington. There was music and dancing, and the party
stretched into the wee hours. "We were so happy to have endured as a
couple, as a family, after all we've been through," remembers
Malachy.
Days later, Malachy received a call he had been
dreading. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), under the
jurisdiction of the Justice Department, had completely reversed the
initial ruling.
Bernadette and the kids had 30 days to leave the
country. Malachy was considered a fugitive.
Twenty federal agents clad in jumpsuits descended
on the McAllister home on the morning of Nov. 21, 2001. Malachy
wasn't there. Agents camped outside for a week and, according to
Malachy, repeatedly taunted his wife and threatened the family with
arrest.
The McAllisters' congressman, Democrat Steve
Rothman, quickly fired off a letter—co-signed by ten other members
of Congress—to Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge on the family's
behalf.
"This whole case is a great injustice," wrote
Rothman. "The McAllisters fled violent, political persecution and
found refuge here in America. They should not be forced to return to
Northern Ireland, under any circumstances, where they might well
face further attempts on their lives."
When denying McAllister's plea for asylum, the BIA
ruled that conditions have improved in Northern Ireland enough that
the McAllisters would not be in danger if they were forced to
return. McAllister expressed disbelief. His enemies are waiting, he
says, and that his case has garnered a lot of publicity back home
only makes him more of a target.
"Belfast may have changed some," he says. "But the
same people who attacked my home in 1988 are still in power today."
McAllister also received broad support from
Irish-Americans still simmering from the McNicholl case. (On Monday,
McNicholl's attorneys plans to file a petition with U.S. Supreme
Court requesting judicial review.)
"Irish-Americans who have for so long been
law-abiding citizens have now become outlaws," says Ned McGinley,
president of the Ancient Order of Hibernians and former president of
the Pennsylvania chapter. "It is a misuse of Homeland Security
personnel and finance. It may help them bump up their statistics,
but it is not fighting terrorism."
Indeed, there has been, in the wake of 9/11, a
widespread crackdown on Irish immigrants with nationalist pasts, who
for years have enjoyed lax immigration standards, especially under
the Clinton administration, which was heavily involved in brokering
the 1998 Good Friday Peace Accord in Northern Ireland.
"They have lumped us up with other groups," says
McGinley.
When reached for comment on the McAllister case,
Kerry Gill, a spokesperson for the Newark office of Immigrations and
Customs Enforcement of the Department of the Homeland Security,
declined to answer any questions.
With Rothman's support, the McAllister family was
granted a temporary reprieve by the Homeland Security Department.
This January, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to review
his case, finding that it raised several constitutional issues.
The BIA found that McAllister had "engaged in
terrorist activities." McAllister's lawyer, Eamonn Dornan, is asking
the Third Circuit Court to clarify the exact definition of that
phrase, a legal exacting that could offer wide-ranging precedent in
these post-9/11 times.
"Our argument is that there is no clear, precise
definition of what "engaging in terrorist activities' actually
means," explains Dornan. "Because it is so overly broad, it becomes
unconstitutional."
Dornan argues that McAllister's actions should not
be viewed as terrorism since they took place during a political
uprising, in which the United States was neutral, and targeted
combatants rather than civilians. Even if the court finds McAllister
did indeed engage in terrorist activities, argues Dornan, that does
not automatically mean there exists, as the BIA ruled,
"reasonable grounds for regarding that person as a danger to the
security of the United States."
There is legal precedent supporting Dornan's
argument that a one-size-fits-all approach cannot be applied to
terrorism.
"One country's terrorist," reads a 2003 federal
appeals court ruling, "can be another country's freedom fighter."
For his part, McAllister bristles at the label
"terrorist."
"What have I done over the last 16 years," he
asks, "besides raise my kids, pay my taxes, be a good citizen and
prove that I am no threat to the United States?"
In April of this year, Bernadette McAllister was
diagnosed with ovarian cancer. She died six weeks later, on her 46th
birthday. Malachy was holding her hand.
More than 400 mourners showed up for her funeral
Mass. A number of politicians attended. Senator Hillary Rodham
Clinton, of New York, sent a Mass Card. Malachy read a eulogy.
"You are free at last," he said. "I love you and I
will always miss you."
Because of the uncertainity of the McAllisters'
future, Bernadette's remains were cremated after the Mass. Where her
ashes will rest permanently depends on the court decision.
"Every day without my wife is a struggle," he says
now, outside the courthouse, choking up. "She had to endure so much
over the years, just to try and raise her family in peace."
He pulls a memorial card from his suit jacket. It
contains a smiling photo of Bernadette, looking beautiful in a white
gown.
"I'm still in shock," he says.
Sometimes, he says, he feels like giving up. He'd
return to Ireland in a moment if he could have her back, but he will
fight on for his children.
"For Bernie and I, our struggle has always been to
remain in America so our kids could have a better life than we had.
She'd want me to keep fighting. And I will," he says, taking one
last glance at the courthouse. "I don't know what the future holds.
But there's still some hope." |